MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804853813 · doi:10.1109/mintc.2018.8363152

Review of potential security attacks in VANET

2018· article· en· W2804853813 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Anwar Shahid, Arunita Jaekel, C. I. Ezeife, Qasim Al-Ajmi, Ikjot Saini

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVehicular ad hoc networkComputer scienceComputer securityWireless ad hoc networkConfidentialityComputer networkPopularityAuthentication (law)Routing (electronic design automation)Mobile ad hoc networkTelecommunicationsWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vehicular Ad hoc Networks (VANETs) is a special branch of ad hoc network which consists of cars as network nodes, Road-side units (RSU) and On-Board Unit(OBU). Basic purpose of VANETs is to provide efficient routing and better safety for drivers and passengers. This emerging technology is gaining more and more popularity as car accidents are increasing in the world. In this self-oriented network, security and privacy is so crucial. In this paper, we review the potential threats to Availability, Confidentiality, Authentication and Integrity in VANETs and, we also compare the type of potential attacks and its solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207