MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2804900192 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2018.49

The Calgary Brain Bank

2018· article· en· W2804900192 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jessil Joseph, Peter K. Stys, Josef E. Braun, Ana Alvarez-Veronesi, Evan N. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurodegenerationPathologyAutopsyMedicineLewy bodyAlzheimer's diseaseDementiaPathologicalDiseaseHuman brainNeuroscienceDementia with Lewy bodiesBiologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the financial assistance from two donors, we have established a neurodegenerative disease brain bank at the University of Calgary. At autopsy, tissues from anatomically specific regions are frozen in liquid nitrogen vapour and stored in small, bar-coded cryovials. Cases include patients with dementia, movement disorders, demyelinating diseases, and normal controls. We prepare additional FFPE blocks for diagnosis or banking. Sampling includes all major areas of cortex and most subcortical structures. All brains, including “normal” controls, are characterized with a basic set of stains and major classification schemata are used for Alzheimer and Lewy body diseases. These tissues are available to investigators with IRB-approved research on human tissues Control tissue is important in the study of age-associated neurodegeneration. We preserve tissues from areas of brain that either are severely or minimally affected by neurodegeneration (e.g. in Alzheimer disease, Brodmann areas 9 and 17, respectively). In our “normal” aging cohort, which includes patients with no described neurodegenerative diseases, we find frequent evidence of low-stage Alzheimer or Lewy body related pathological changes. We also find relatively frequent small vessel disease, which in part relates to our preferential selection of patient’s who died suddenly. In preliminary studies, we have examined amyloid plaque structure with confocal microscopy using beta-sheet sensitive dyes and have studied the distribution of different chaperones in normal brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.748

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2240.104

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→