MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804906015 · doi:10.3390/sym10060182

Some Approaches to the Calculation of Conservation Laws for a Telegraph System and Their Comparisons

2018· article· en· W2804906015 on OpenAlexaff
Eerdun Buhe, George W. Bluman, Alatancang Chen, HU Yu-lan

Bibliographic record

VenueSymmetry · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsConservation lawSymmetry (geometry)Recursion (computer science)Nonlinear systemAction (physics)MathematicsLawApplied mathematicsPhysicsMathematical analysisAlgorithmQuantum mechanicsGeometryPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper applies the direct construction method, symmetry/adjoint symmetry pair method (SA method), symmetry action on a known conservation law method, Ibragimov’s conservation theorem (which always yields the same results as the SA method) and a recursion formula to calculate several conservation laws for nonlinear telegraph systems. In addition, a comparison is made between these methods for conservation laws admitted by nonlinear telegraph systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSymmetrySame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207