MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804907487 · doi:10.1029/2017wr022105

Copula‐Based Chance‐Constrained Hydro‐Economic Optimization Model for Optimal Design of Reservoir‐Irrigation District Systems under Multiple Interdependent Sources of Uncertainty

2018· article· en· W2804907487 on OpenAlexafffund
Hosein Alizadeh, S. Jamshid Mousavi, K. Ponnambalam

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Resources Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater resources management and optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsIrrigationCopula (linguistics)InterdependenceInflowEnvironmental scienceOptimal designWater resource managementAgricultural engineeringEconometricsEconomicsMathematicsStatisticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents a new explicit stochastic hydro‐economic optimization model for reservoir‐irrigation district systems design affected by multiple interdependent sources of uncertainties. The model solution determines both optimal design and long‐term operation policies of the systems while accounting for uncertainties of reservoir inflow, rainfall, crop yield, crop price, and production costs. The problem is formulated as a chance‐constrained program in which the dependence structure of discrete and continuous random coefficients is accounted for using copula. In addition to design variables such as the sizing of reservoir capacity and the irrigable area, optimal reservoir operation policies and irrigation management strategies are determined. The model performance and significance is tested in the case study of Chamshir hydrosystem in Iran, consisting of Chamshir Dam and downstream irrigation districts. Various scenarios assessing baseline conditions, risk attitude, and the impacts of change in climatic inputs and upstream conditions are also evaluated. The model results are used to quantify the interrelationships and trade‐offs among optimal values of design parameters, optimal irrigation policy, decision‐makers' risk‐attitude, uncertainty levels of agro‐economic factors, and target reliability levels of meeting crop yield and water requirement. The results demonstrate that smaller sizes of the reservoir and the irrigation district and stress‐avoidance irrigation policies, rather than deficit‐irrigation policies, are preferred when the decision maker is risk‐averse and uncertainties in agro‐economic factors and reliability levels are large. Additionally, we show how the optimal cropping pattern and irrigation strategies are affected by climate change‐induced rainfall variations and the alteration of conditions upstream of the project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Resources ResearchSame topicWater resources management and optimizationFrench-language works237,207