Copula‐Based Chance‐Constrained Hydro‐Economic Optimization Model for Optimal Design of Reservoir‐Irrigation District Systems under Multiple Interdependent Sources of Uncertainty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents a new explicit stochastic hydro‐economic optimization model for reservoir‐irrigation district systems design affected by multiple interdependent sources of uncertainties. The model solution determines both optimal design and long‐term operation policies of the systems while accounting for uncertainties of reservoir inflow, rainfall, crop yield, crop price, and production costs. The problem is formulated as a chance‐constrained program in which the dependence structure of discrete and continuous random coefficients is accounted for using copula. In addition to design variables such as the sizing of reservoir capacity and the irrigable area, optimal reservoir operation policies and irrigation management strategies are determined. The model performance and significance is tested in the case study of Chamshir hydrosystem in Iran, consisting of Chamshir Dam and downstream irrigation districts. Various scenarios assessing baseline conditions, risk attitude, and the impacts of change in climatic inputs and upstream conditions are also evaluated. The model results are used to quantify the interrelationships and trade‐offs among optimal values of design parameters, optimal irrigation policy, decision‐makers' risk‐attitude, uncertainty levels of agro‐economic factors, and target reliability levels of meeting crop yield and water requirement. The results demonstrate that smaller sizes of the reservoir and the irrigation district and stress‐avoidance irrigation policies, rather than deficit‐irrigation policies, are preferred when the decision maker is risk‐averse and uncertainties in agro‐economic factors and reliability levels are large. Additionally, we show how the optimal cropping pattern and irrigation strategies are affected by climate change‐induced rainfall variations and the alteration of conditions upstream of the project.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".