MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804979937

The layout book [2nd ed]

2015· book-chapter· en· W2804979937 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Barrie Tullett

Bibliographic record

VenueLincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGraphic Design and Typography
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScheme (mathematics)Performance artArt historyArtEngineeringVisual artsMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bloomsbury have published the second edition of The Layout Book, written by Gavin Ambrose and Paul Harris, and The Caseroom Press appear twice.Both Philippa Wood and Barrie Tullett are members of the International Society of Typographic Designers and Barrie is on the Education Panel of the Student Awards Scheme. One of Barrie's projects for the ISTD – Flatland – has been used as one of eight ‘exercises’ in the book. Flatland asked students to re-imagine the conventions of the book itself. The work chosen to illustrate a successful solution was by Matt Crowe, a Lincoln graduate from 2011.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3090.248

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLincoln Repository (University of Lincoln)Same topicGraphic Design and TypographyFrench-language works237,207