Microbial consortia developed for Ocimum tenuiflorum reduces application of chemical fertilizers by 50% under field conditions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An earlier study conducted under glass house conditions revealed a strong synergistic relationship between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF-Glomus monosporum) and the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR-Pantoea dispersa) screened and selected for inoculating Ocimum tenuiflorum. The present study was undertaken to validate the results of glass house studies under field conditions. The field experiment was conducted with selected microbial consortia with varying levels of chemical fertilizers in order to find out the possibility of reducing the recommended level of chemical fertilizers for O. tenuiflorum cultivation. The results obtained from the field experiment suggested that inoculation with microbial consortia increased plant growth, dry weight, essential oil concentration compared to uninoculated plants. The results also brought out that 50% of recommended NPK fertilizer can be reduced through inoculation with microbial consortia with no adverse effect on growth and yield of O. tenuiflorum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it