MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2805164172 · doi:10.1002/chem.201801543

Ultrafast Adiabatic Photodehydration of 2‐Hydroxymethylphenol and the Formation of Quinone Methide

2018· article· en· W2805164172 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Đani Škalamera, Ivana Antol, Kata Mlinarić‐Majerski, Hrvoj Vančik, David Lee Phillips, Jiani Ma, Nikola Basarić

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis of Indole Derivatives
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHrvatska Zaklada za ZnanostChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationUniversity of Victoria
KeywordsPhotochemistryChemistryConical intersectionPhotoexcitationUltrafast laser spectroscopyExcited stateHomolysisIntramolecular forceReactivity (psychology)Quinone methideSpectroscopyRadicalQuinoneStereochemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistryAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The photochemical reactivity of 2‐hydroxymethylphenol (1) was investigated experimentally by photochemistry under cryogenic conditions, by detecting reactive intermediates by IR spectroscopy, and by using nanosecond and femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopic methods in solution at room temperature. In addition, theoretical studies were performed to facilitate the interpretation of the experimental results and also to simulate the reaction pathway to obtain a better understanding of the reaction mechanism. The main finding of this work is that photodehydration of 1 takes place in an ultrafast adiabatic photochemical reaction without any clear intermediate, delivering quinone methide (QM) in the excited state. Upon photoexcitation to a higher vibrational level of the singlet excited state, 1 undergoes vibrational relaxation leading to two photochemical pathways, one by which synchronous elimination of H2O gives QM 2 in its S1 state and the other by which homolytic cleavage of the phenolic O−H bond produces a phenoxyl radical (S0). Both are ultrafast processes that occur within a picosecond. The excited state of QM 2 (S1) probably deactivates to S0 through a conical intersection to give QM 2 (S0), which subsequently delivers benzoxete 4. Elucidation of the reaction mechanisms for the photodehydration of phenols by which QMs are formed is important to tune the reactivity of QMs with DNA and proteins for the potential application of QMs in medicine as therapeutic agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry - A European JournalSame topicSynthesis of Indole DerivativesFrench-language works237,207