MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2805245931 · doi:10.1520/mpc20170079

Study on the Role of Casting Defects and Surface Finish on Fatigue Life in Die-cast AM60B Magnesium Alloy Using X-Ray Computed Tomography

2018· article· en· W2805245931 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Performance and Characterization · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceDie castingMagnesium alloyMetallurgyDie (integrated circuit)AlloyCastingComputed tomographyMagnesiumMedicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Magnesium alloy has attracted considerable attention from the automotive industry because of its low density and high specific strength combined with excellent casting capabilities. However, the role of casting defects and surface finish on the fatigue life emerges as a major concern. To study the role of surface finish, the die-cast skin was removed from the selected test specimens by hand polishing. No major difference in surface roughness was observed between the die-cast and polished surface. To characterize the casting defects in each test specimen, prior to the fatigue test, X-ray computed tomography (XCT) scans were performed on a desktop micro-XCT scanner. The preliminary XCT scans revealed a large number of gas and shrinkage pores concentrated in the center sections of the test specimens and a few scattered close to the free surface. In addition to gas and shrinkage pores, in unpolished specimens, small microcracks and notch-like surface imperfections were also observed on the edge of the test specimens. Strain controlled fatigue tests were performed on polished and unpolished test specimens at a 0.3 % strain amplitude. After every 2,000 fatigue cycles, the test was interrupted and XCT was performed to study the crack initiation and propagation in the respective test specimens. The fatigue test exhibited no major difference in fatigue life between the unpolished and polished specimens. However, XCT scans revealed the dominant fatigue crack initiated from the surface imperfections in unpolished specimens and from casting pores closer to the free surface in polished specimens. The fatigue test results and spatial distribution of casting pores were compared with the specimens extracted from a die-cast shock-tower structure from a previous study. Although a difference in spatial distribution of the casting pores was observed, it had no major impact on the fatigue life between the two sets of specimens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it