MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2805342704 · doi:10.1109/icps.2018.8369961

Support vector machine based dynamic load model using synchrophasor data

2018· article· en· W2805342704 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaodong Liang, Yi He, Massimo Mitolo, Weixing Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhasorSupport vector machineElectric power systemComputer scienceDynamic load testingData modelingGridSmart gridPower (physics)Control theory (sociology)Control engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Load modeling remains a challenging task in planning, operation and control of power grids. In this paper, a support vector machine (SVM) based machine learning method is proposed for dynamic load modeling of large scale power systems using synchrophasor data recorded by Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs). The difference equation based dynamic load model structure is recommended, however, if a traditional transfer function based model format is preferred, it can be directly obtained from difference equation based model. Case studies are conducted using PMU data recorded in a large power grid in North America. The accuracy of the developed load models is verified by comparing the simulated load model dynamic response with real PMU data. The proposed method not only provides an accurate dynamic load model, parameters of the load model can also be easily updated using new synchrophasor data for either on-line or off-line applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207