MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2805442304 · doi:10.1039/c8ib00063h

Enhancing fluorescent protein photostability through robot-assisted photobleaching

2018· article· en· W2805442304 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew Wiens, Friederike Hoffmann, Y. Chen, Robert E. Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueIntegrative Biology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsAlberta Hospital EdmontonUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of AlbertaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFondation Brain CanadaFoundation for the National Institutes of Health
KeywordsPhotobleachingFluorescenceFluorescent proteinFluorescence recovery after photobleachingGreen fluorescent proteinFluorescent labellingChemistryBiophysicsBiochemistryComputational biologyBiologyCell biologyOpticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Improving fluorescent proteins through the use of directed evolution requires robust techniques for screening large libraries of genetic variants. Here we describe an effective and relatively low-cost system for screening libraries of fluorescent protein variants for improved photostability in the context of colonies on a Petri dish. Application of this system to the yellow fluorescent protein mCitrine, led to the development of Citrine2 with improved photostability and similar high fluorescent brightness. The photobleaching robot was constructed using a Lego Mindstorms Ev3 set and a xenon arc lamp, which together create even and high irradiance over an entire Petri dish through patterned illumination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntegrative BiologySame topicAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207