MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2805606097 · doi:10.1016/j.vgie.2018.04.005

Double-lumen duodenum with obscure overt GI bleeding

2018· article· en· W2805606097 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Bechara, Mohamed Albabtain, Andrew Kwan, David Hurlbut

Bibliographic record

VenueVideoGIE · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsKingston Health Sciences CentreQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDuodenumGI bleedingLumen (anatomy)GastroenterologyGeneral surgeryInternal medicineEndoscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intraluminal duodenal diverticula are rare congenital malformations that may present with vague abdominal symptoms such as pain or bloating; however, patients may also present with pancreatitis, biliary obstruction, duodenal obstruction, or GI bleeding. We report a case of intraluminal duodenal diverticulum causing recurrent overt GI bleeding and exhibiting a unique endoscopic appearance of a double lumen (Video 1, available online at www.VideoGIE.org). A 67-year-old woman was admitted with melena and an acute drop in hemoglobin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVideoGIESame topicGastrointestinal disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207