MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2805606097 · doi:10.1016/j.vgie.2018.04.005

Double-lumen duodenum with obscure overt GI bleeding

2018· article· en· W2805606097 on OpenAlex
Robert Bechara, Mohamed Albabtain, Andrew Kwan, David Hurlbut

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVideoGIE · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsKingston Health Sciences CentreQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDuodenumGI bleedingLumen (anatomy)GastroenterologyGeneral surgeryInternal medicineEndoscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intraluminal duodenal diverticula are rare congenital malformations that may present with vague abdominal symptoms such as pain or bloating; however, patients may also present with pancreatitis, biliary obstruction, duodenal obstruction, or GI bleeding. We report a case of intraluminal duodenal diverticulum causing recurrent overt GI bleeding and exhibiting a unique endoscopic appearance of a double lumen (Video 1, available online at www.VideoGIE.org). A 67-year-old woman was admitted with melena and an acute drop in hemoglobin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it