MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2805663624 · doi:10.1109/tec.2018.2841427

SoH-Aware Charging of Supercapacitors With Energy Efficiency Maximization

2018· article· en· W2805663624 on OpenAlexafffund
Heng Li, Jun Peng, Yanhui Zhou, Jianping He, Zhiwu Huang, Liang He, Jianping Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSupercapacitorEfficient energy useCapacitanceComputer scienceResistorMaximizationEnergy (signal processing)MicrocontrollerCapacitorElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringAutomotive engineeringEngineeringEmbedded systemVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent years have seen significant advances in supercapacitor-based applications in portable electronics, where the switching resistor circuit acts as a common cell balancing circuit when charging the supercapacitors. However, existing charging control methods suffer from low energy efficiency, leading to considerable energy loss, and thermal heating. In this paper, we propose a state-of-health (SoH)-aware energy-efficient charging method to maximize the energy efficiency of supercapacitors during the charging process. First, we provide a sufficient and necessary condition to maximize the energy efficiency. Then, an online SoH estimation algorithm is designed to estimate capacitance and balancing resistance in real time. Thereafter, an SoH-aware energy-efficient charging algorithm is further proposed to be implemented in microcontrollers. A charger prototype has been built to verify the effectiveness of the proposed charging algorithm. Extensive simulation and experiment results show that the energy efficiency of the proposed design is improved considerably when compared with existing methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.635

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Energy ConversionSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207