Antiphospholipid antibodies in epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Autoimmunity is believed to play an important causative role in the pathogenesis of epilepsy. There are evidences for the presence of autoantibodies in patients with epilepsy. To date, many studies have assessed the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) in epilepsy patients, though the relationship has been inconclusive. AIMS: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the presence of aPLs in epileptic patients as compared to healthy controls. METHODS: Five electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar) were searched systematically. Study-specific odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects model. Quality assessment was carried out by using the modified 9-star Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). L'Abbé plots were generated to visually inspect heterogeneity while publication bias was evaluated via visualization of contour- enhanced funnel plots, and Begg's and Egger's tests. RESULTS: Based on the inclusion criteria, 14 studies were selected involving 1248 epilepsy patients and 800 healthy controls. The majority of epilepsy was categorised as generalised or partial and none had comorbidity with autoimmune diseases. Significant presence of both anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies (OR: 5.16, 95% CI: 3.21-8.28, p < 0.00001) and anti-β2- glycoprotein I (anti-β2-GPI) antibodies (OR: 2.95, 95% CI: 1.07-8.11, p = 0.04) exhibited comorbid association with epilepsy patients as compared to healthy controls. Subgroup analyses revealed that presence of aCL antibodies was more specifically observed in paediatrics (OR: 4.57, 95% CI: 2.57-8.15, p < 0.00001) than adults (OR: 4.24, 95% CI: 1.80-10.01, p = 0.001). The odds of aCL antibody presence was higher in partial epilepsy patients (OR: 7.88, 95% CI: 3.23-19.24, p < 0.00001) than that of generalised (OR: 3.76, 95% CI: 2.15-6.59, p < 0.00001) and in Asian epileptic patients (OR: 9.56, 95% CI: 2.69-33.95, p = 0.0005) than Europeans (OR: 4.35, 95% CI: 2.74-6.92, p < 0.00001). The presence of anti-β2-GPI antibodies was significant in paediatric (OR: 6.44, 95% CI: 1.39-29.89, p = 0.02) and African population with epilepsies (OR: 10.59, 95% CI: 1.22-92.25, p = 0.03). NOS of the majority of the studies (11/14) indicated a high methodological quality. No substantial heterogeneity was observed either from the quantitative analysis or from the L'Abbé plots while no significant publication bias was detected from funnel plots; Begg's and Egger's tests. CONCLUSION: Since none of the epilepsy subjects exhibited any comorbid autoimmune disorders, significant presence of aCL and anti-β2-GPI antibodies indicate towards their contribution in immune-mediated general pathogenesis of epilepsy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.016 | 0.030 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".