Influence of implementing a protocol for an intravenously administered ammonia scavenger on the management of acute hyperammonemia in a pediatric intensive care unit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of establishing a protocol for the use of combined sodium benzoate and sodium phenylacetate (SBSP) (Ammonul®) to treat acute hyperammonemia. This was a retrospective, single-center study in a 24-bed medical and surgical pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in a tertiary care teaching maternal-child hospital in Canada. Inclusion criteria were age < 18 years, PICU admission between 1 January 2000 and 30 June 2016, and SBSP treatment. An SBSP delivery protocol was implemented in our hospital on 30 August 2008 in order to improve management of acute hyperammonemia. Patients were assigned to one of the two groups, without or with protocol, depending on date of admission. SBSP was ordered 34 times during the study period, and 23 orders were considered for analysis (14 with and 9 without protocol). Patient characteristics were similar between groups. The median time from diagnosis to prescription was significantly shorter in the protocol group [40 min (21-82) vs 100 min (70-150), p = 0.03)] but the median time from diagnosis to administration of the treatment was equivalent [144 min (90-220) vs 195 (143-274), (p = 0.2)]. Other clinical outcomes did not differ. This study is the first to compare two SBSP delivery strategies in the treatment of acute hyperammonemia in this PICU setting. Implementation of a delivery protocol shortened the time from diagnosis of hyperammonemia to prescription of SBSP and helped us identify other parameters that can be improved to optimize treatment delivery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".