MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2805798929 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1478780

Generation And Control Of An Ultrafast Electron Vortex Beam Via Chiral Plasmonic Near - Fields

2018· article· en· W2805798929 on OpenAlexaff
Giovanni Maria Vanacore, Gabriele Berruto, Ivan Madan, Enrico Pomarico, Paolo Biagioni, R. J. Lamb, Ori Reinhardt

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrbital Angular Momentum in Optics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsFemtosecondUltrashort pulsePhysicsPlasmonElectronAttosecondVortexWave packetOpticsLaserAtomic physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Imparting orbital angular momentum (OAM) to particle beams opens unique opportunities for applications and exploration of fundamental science. Electron beams carrying OAM are commonly achieved via passive phase masks that imprint a transverse modulation on the particle wave function. Here, we show that a chiral plasmonic near field can be used to generate an OAM-carrying electron beam and dynamically control its vorticity. By monitoring the phase change of the transverse electron wave function in both real space and reciprocal space using ultrafast transmission electron microscopy, we demonstrate that an optically-excited chiral near-field with azimuthal order m = 1 is able to imprint an azimuthally varying 2πℓm phase shift on the electron wave function, where ℓ is the number of exchanged plasmons. In contrast to other passive monolithic methods, our approach enables a dynamic coherent control over the vortex beam properties with attosecond precision. This is achieved by properly modifying the optical field distribution using a sequence of two phase-locked light pulses with independent polarization states and delayed by fractions of their optical cycles. We discuss the potential extension of our method to composite charged particles to yield insights into their inner structure, with particular attention to the proton and the origin of its spin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsFrench-language works237,207