ANALISIS PENGARUH PEMASANGAN JENIS TURBO CYCLONE DAN INTAKE MANIFOLD MODIFIKASI TERHADAP KONSUMSI BAHAN BAKAR PADA SEPEDA MOTOR KARBURATOR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penurunan konsumsi bahan bakar pada sepeda motor dengan pemasangan jenis turbo cyclone dan intake manifold modifikasi dibandingkan dengan kondisi sepeda motor standar. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menggunakan putaran mesin atau rotation per minutes (rpm) sebagai variabel kontrolnya, yaitu pada 1500 rpm, 4500 rpm dan 7500 rpm. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode eksperimen. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah konsumsi bahan bakar mengalami penurunan paling baik pada saat menggunakan free vane turbo cyclone dengan intake manifold standar dengan rata-rata penurunan sebesar 0,67 ml/menit atau 13,4% pada putaran mesin 1.500 rpm, pada putaran mesin 4.500 rpm sebesar 1,5 ml/menit atau 11,54%, dan pada putaran mesin 7.500 rpm sebesar 1,5 ml/menit atau 7,5%. Dan untuk jumlah total konsumsi bahan bakar mengalami penurunan sebesar 11 ml/menit atau 9,65% bila dibandingkan dengan kondisi standar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".