MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2805983129 · doi:10.1061/9780784481578.060

A Multistage Signal Matching Approach for Pile Capacity Estimation Using the Instrumented Becker Penetration Test

2018· article· en· W2805983129 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIFCEE 2018 · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersDepartment of Water Resources
KeywordsPileStandard penetration testDepth soundingPenetration testAccelerationGeotechnical engineeringComputer scienceStructural engineeringEngineeringGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recently developed instrumented Becker penetration test (iBPT) when configured as a reusable test pile provides direct measurements of strain and acceleration at up to five locations along the drill string. This paper describes details of the test system, measurements, and presents representative results from an iBPT sounding performed at a predominantly fine sand site where indicator test piles were previously installed. The ability of the iBPT system to estimate equivalent SPT N60 values at the site is first demonstrated. Representative iBPT pile driving analysis (PDA) measurements obtained from the multiple modules at the base and along the shaft during field driving is then presented. Finally, a new multistage signal matching approach for estimating the distribution of resistance along the pile, and pile ultimate capacity is demonstrated using individual iBPT module dynamic measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it