MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806037387

Strategic Planning at the Elementary School Level

2018· article· en· W2806037387 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alex Mitchell

Bibliographic record

Venue2018 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOrganizational Leadership and Management Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStrategic planningStrategic thinkingInterviewStrategic financial managementStrategic human resource planningBusinessPlan (archaeology)Public relationsProcess (computing)Strategic leadershipProcess managementKnowledge managementPolitical scienceMarketingComputer scienceGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Strategic planning is a catchy buzzword that is influencing organizational behaviour in many industries, including education. Strategic planning is vision and goal setting process that aims to solve both short- and long-term problems of the organization. Strategic planning is an inherently political process: organizational strengths, problems, and opportunities can be highly contested. Educational strategic planning literature exclusively explores strategic planning at the school district level. However, strategic planning happens at the local level as well. In Ontario, principals are mandated to create School Improvement Plans (SIP). This research focuses on the strategic plan of the local school by interviewing elementary school administrators responsible for creating SIPs, and comparing interview and SIP data to district-level strategic planning documents. Three key areas of interest arise in the paper: (1) administrator perception of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score0.932

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2018 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of EducationSame topicOrganizational Leadership and Management StrategiesFrench-language works237,207