MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806042952 · doi:10.7202/1044395ar

Acteurs et instruments dans la lutte contre Boko-Haram

2016· article· fr· W2806042952 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Danielle Kadje

Bibliographic record

VenueSens public · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans ce monde en mutation, un terrorisme massif, mutant, asymétrique et islamisé a pris progressivement racine : la menace islamiste radicale, illustrée notamment par la nébuleuse Al-Qaida, figure de proue du Djihadisme est aujourd'hui concurrencée par des groupes africains de création récente à l'instar de Boko Haram (Pérouse de Montclos, 2012 ; Guibbaud 2014 ; Koungou, 2014 ; Saibou, 2014 ; Pommerolle, 2015). Ce phénomène transnational désormais au cœur de la vie socio-politique camerounaise et nigériane interpelle à plus d'un titre. Cette nouvelle dynamique belliciste, objet d’une action publique multi-niveaux analyse les déclinaisons d’un pan des assauts de cette secte islamiste. (Apard, 2015 : 135). Cette étude interroge tour à tour, l’imbrication d’acteurs multiples aux registres différents qui participent à la mise en œuvre de cette action publique spécifique et les instruments de cette dynamique multi-niveaux et asymétrique au Cameroun et au Nigéria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.015
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSens publicSame topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, GenderFrench-language works237,207