MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806054144

Icebreaker Operations in the Arctic Ocean

2018· article· en· W2806054144 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jeff Gilmour

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of military and strategic studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe arcticArcticOceanographyGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Russia's Icebreaker Capabilities -Arctic OceanArktika class icebreakers are the bulk of the Russian nuclear icebreaker fleet, used primarily to aid shipping along the Northern Sea Route.Of the seven nuclear icebreakers, one is a containership with an ice-breaking bow, and two, the "Taymyr" and the "Vaygach" have been built for shallow waters in rivers transporting lumber, ore and other cargo.Approximately 2,000 people work aboard the icebreakers, which are based at the Atomlot harbour in the Murmansk Fjord.Arktika class icebreakers have a double hull and can operate in ice in 2.5 meters (8.2 ft) thick at speeds of up to 10 knots.In ice-free waters, the maximum speed of these ships is as much as 21 knots.There is water ballast between the inner and outer hulls which can be shifted to aid icebreaking operations.Icebreaking is also assisted by an air bubbling system which delivers air from jets below the surface.The ships have two reactors, three propellers totaling 75,000 hp, and can operate for approximately 7 months at sea and 4 years between refuelling.The crew normally includes 130-200 personnel.The 50 Let Pobedy, built in 2007, is the world's largest nuclear icebreaker, at 159 meters in length.It also carries two Ka-32 helicopters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of military and strategic studiesSame topicSpacecraft and Cryogenic TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207