MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806103334 · doi:10.14745/ccdr.v43i34a01f

L’infection tuberculeuse latente : un aperçu

2017· article· fr· W2806103334 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
S Kiazyk, T. Blake Ball

Bibliographic record

VenueRelevé des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicDiagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
Canadian institutionsResearch ManitobaUniversity of ManitobaPublic Health Agency of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'infection tuberculeuse latente (ITL) se définit comme un état caractérisé par une réponse immunitaire persistante à la stimulation par des antigènes de Mycobacterium tuberculosis, sans signes cliniques manifestes de tuberculose active.Les individus qui ont l'ITL représentent un réservoir propice à l'apparition de cas de tuberculose active.Le dépistage et la prise en charge de l'ITL sont aujourd'hui deux volets clés de la Stratégie de l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé pour mettre fin à la tuberculose, ainsi que du cadre d'action fédéral pour la prévention et le contrôle de la tuberculose mis en place par le gouvernement du Canada.L'importance accordée à ces deux volets s'explique du fait que l'ITL peut évoluer en tuberculose active ou être réactivée, un risque qui augmente largement chez les personnes immunodéprimées.Dans cet article, nous présentons un résumé de l'ITL et du risque de réactivation de l'infection et examinons les avancées récentes dans le diagnostic et le traitement de cette infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRelevé des maladies transmissibles au CanadaSame topicDiagnosis and treatment of tuberculosisFrench-language works237,207