The Fog Remote Sensing and Modeling (FRAM) field project and preliminary results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main purpose of this work is to describe a major field project on fog and summarize the preliminary results. The three field phases of Fog Remote Sensing and Modeling (FRAM) project were conducted over two regions of Canada: 1) Center for Atmospheric Research Experiments (CARE), Toronto, Ontario (FRAM-C), and 2) Lunenburg, Nova Scotia (FRAM-L1;L2). The FRAM-C component representing continental fog, and FRAM-L, representing the marine fog environment, took place from November 2005 to April 2006, and during June of 2006 and 2007, respectively. The main objectives of the project were 1) better description of fog environments, 2) development of microphysical parameterizations for model applications, 3) development of remote sensing methods for fog nowcasting/forecasting, 4) understanding of issues related to instrument capabilities and improvement of the analysis, and 5) integration of model data with observations to predict and detect fog areas and particle phase. During the project phases, various measurements at the surface, including droplet spectra and concentration, aerosol concentrations, visibility, 3D turbulent wind components, radiative fluxes, precipitation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".