Presentation of ADHD in preschool-aged children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) among preschool-aged children has been increasing steadily in the last 10 years [1]. ADHD is associated with a number of negative outcomes for preschoolers including poor health, increased risky behavior, social problems and poor academic performance [1]. Parents of preschoolers with ADHD also report increased stress and worry. Despite this, our knowledge of evidence-based pharmacological and psychosocial treatments for preschool-aged children (under 6 years of age) is limited. Additional research is needed to examine the efficacy and safety of all interventions, both pharmacological and psychosocial, for this population of youth. Gaining a better understanding of the long-term effects of psychiatric medications on the developing brains of preschoolers is important in advancing our understanding of outcomes for these children over the lifespan [1]. A growing body of evidence suggests that parent training for preschoolers is an effective first-line treatment to help decrease unwanted behaviors, decrease parental stress and increase parental effectiveness. Careful assessment and behavioral interventions are recommended to be the first line of treatment for preschoolers with ADHD, and pharmacological treatment is reserved for severe cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".