MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2806250022 · doi:10.1558/rsth.30399

Faith-Filled Visions for a Vital Earth Community

2018· article· en· W2806250022 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher Hrynkow

Bibliographic record

VenueReligious Studies and Theology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Ecology, and Ethics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlourishingVisionEnvironmental ethicsPremiseFaithEncyclicalSustainable developmentSociologyPovertyEcologyPolitical sciencePhilosophyLawEpistemologySocial psychologyPsychologyAnthropologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The world is faced with virulent social and ecological crises. Associated challenges like global climate change, poverty, racism, biodiversity loss, sexism, and ecological degradation cry out for deeply sustainable solutions. Such solutions can help achieve a situation of socio-ecological flourishing. Synthesizing these premises, this article employs a theo-ecoethical perspective to map Pope Francis’s vision for sustainable social and ecological relationships as sourced in his first social encyclical, Laudato Si’. Through this approach it is demonstrated that in contrast to the premise that Christian belief in the afterlife mitigates against caring for the natural world, the Pope has articulated a faith-filled vision that supports socio-ecological flourishing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.036
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReligious Studies and Theology→Same topicReligion, Ecology, and Ethics→French-language works237,207→