Announcing the winner of the John J. Sciarra IJGO Prize Paper Award for 2008
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of rectal naproxen for reducing perineal pain after vaginal delivery.Methods: A double-blind randomized controlled trial of 142 post partum women randomly allocated to receive either naproxen (71 patients) or placebo (71 patients) suppositories.The first dose was given immediately after complete perineal suturing, while the second dose was given 6 hours post partum.The validated Thai short-form McGill pain questionnaire was used to evaluate perineal pain at 0, 6, and 24 hours post partum.Pain scores were analyzed using the unpaired t test.Results: Pain scores at 6 and 24 hours for women in the naproxen group were significantly lower compared with women in the placebo group (6.4 and 2.3 vs 18.4 and 5.5; P b 0.001).No side effects with naproxen were found.Conclusions: Rectal naproxen is effective and safe for reducing perineal pain after vaginal delivery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".