MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806290846 · doi:10.11159/ffhmt18.190

Effect of Vibration on the Melting of Phase Change Material inside a Cylindrical Enclosure

2018· article· en· W2806290846 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Applied Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnclosureVibrationPhase-change materialMaterials sciencePhase changePhase (matter)Composite materialAcousticsEngineeringPhysicsElectrical engineeringEngineering physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study reports a novel numerical work on the melting of phase change material (PCM) inside a cylindrical enclosure under the application of vibration. No such work is available in the existing literature. To simulate the melting of PCM inside a vertical cylindrical enclosure, the governing equations, namely, the conservation of mass, momentum, and energy equations are solved. In addition to that enthalpy-porosity method is used to model phase change of PCM. COMSOL Multiphysics software is used to simulate the melting behaviour of a PCM during vibration conditions. The objective of the present work is to observe the melting behaviour under the application of vibration. Melting behaviour of PCM inside a vertical cylindrical enclosure has been simulated first without vibration for comparison purpose. It has been observed that vibration affects the melting behaviour significantly. This study is applicable to battery thermal management for the hybrid vehicles where PCM can be used for controlling the temperature of the battery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it