The Fractal Characterization of Mechanical Surface Profile Based on Power Spectral Density and Monte-Carlo Method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The analysis of rough surface morphology plays an important role in the functional characteristics of the contact surface of mechanical parts. Fractal geometry method is more accurate and sensitive than classical statistics model. For fractal representation of rough surface, it is necessary to determine the proper fractal dimension calculation method. In this research, the effect of power spectral density method is studied based on Monte-Carlo method. The fractal dimensions are calculated, the theoretical and the calculated values are compared with paired samples. And the results are compared by non-parametric test. The result shows that power spectral density method has good characterization effect on fractal simulation contour curve. In addition, the precision of fractal dimension of power spectral density is related to fractal dimension of contour theory. The estimation methods of classical power spectral density have different application range.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it