MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806386268 · doi:10.1364/boe.9.002974

Multiwavelength time-resolved near-infrared spectroscopy of the adult head: assessment of intracerebral and extracerebral absorption changes

2018· article· en· W2806386268 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Gerega, Daniel Milej, Wojciech Weigl, Michał Kacprzak, Adam Liebert

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Optics Express · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
FundersNational Center for Research and DevelopmentNarodowe Centrum Nauki
KeywordsImaging phantomDiffuse reflectance infrared fourier transformDiffuse optical imagingMaterials scienceIndocyanine greenOpticsPhoton diffusionDiffuse reflectionSpectroscopyNear-infrared spectroscopyAttenuation coefficientBiomedical engineeringAbsorption (acoustics)PhotonTransmittanceOptical fiberNuclear medicineBolus (digestion)ChemistryPhysicsMedicineTomographySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An optical technique based on diffuse reflectance measurement combined with indocyanine green (ICG) bolus tracking is extensively tested as a method for the clinical assessment of brain perfusion at the bedside. We report on multiwavelength time-resolved diffuse reflectance spectroscopy measurements carried out on the head of a healthy adult during the intravenous administration of a bolus of ICG. Intracerebral and extracerebral changes in absorption were estimated from an analysis of changes in statistical moments (total number of photons, mean time of flight and variance) of the distributions of times of flight (DTOF) of photons recorded simultaneously at 16 wavelengths from the range of 650-850 nm using sensitivity factors estimated by diffusion approximation based on a layered model of the studied medium. We validated the proposed method in a series of phantom experiments and in-vivo measurements. The results obtained show that changes in the concentration of the ICG can be assessed as a function of time of the experiment and depth in the tissue. Thus, the separation of changes in ICG concentration appearing in intra- and extracerebral tissues can be estimated from optical data acquired at a single source-detector pair of fibers/fiber bundles positioned on the surface of the head.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomedical Optics ExpressSame topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207