Le Goût d'imaginer sa vie : Quarante penseurs contemporains à l'épreuve de l'imagination Ed. 1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Si l'imagination au pouvoir etait un slogan, cet ouvrage montre qu'il peut etre une realite. Pres d'une quarantaine de personnalites exceptionnelles ont accepte de partager leur relation avec l'imagination dans leurs domaines respectifs. Qu'ils soient astronaute, philosophe, cyborg, militant ecologiste, mathematicien, anthropologue, acteur, astrophysicien, ou encore chanteur, tous se retrouvent autour de la puissance de l'imagination, elle qui leur a permis d'accomplir des choses hors norme. Le gout d'imaginer sa vie est l'oeuvre collective de femmes et d'hommes d'horizons divers qui construisent la societe du futur, a la force de leur imagination. Une telle concentration de personnalites mondialement reconnues dans leur domaine est une premiere dans un ouvrage collectif. Qu'ils soient francais, chinois, anglais, suisses, canadiens, americains, irlandais, belges, danois, algeriens ou singapouriens, ces 40 penseurs nous confient ici leur vision de l'imagination par leur parcours et leur experience. Ils ne nous offrent pas un chemin trace, ils nous montrent l'existence des chemins. Plus de quarante contributions dont : Jean-Loup Chretien, Jacques Genin, Idriss Aberkane, Laurent Alexandre, Henri Atlan, Marie-Paule Cani, Yves Coppens, Jean-Louis Etienne, Jean Jouzel, Etienne Klein, Michael Lonsdale, Pierre Marcolini, Dominique Meda, Fabrice Midal, Pascal Picq, Pierre Rabhi, Hubert Reeves, Patrick Roger, Joel de Rosnay, Francois Taddei, Jacques Testart, Herve This, Cedric Villani, Didier Wampas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".