MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W280648785 · doi:10.5006/c2001-01211

Effect of Microstructure and Microchemistry on the SCC Behavior of Archival and Modern Pipeline Steels in a High pH Environment

2001· article· en· W280648785 on OpenAlexaff
M.J. Danielson, R.H. Jones, Phil Dusek

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsGRi Simulations (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrochemistryMicrostructurePipeline (software)MetallurgyCathodic protectionMaterials scienceChemistryEngineeringElectrochemistryMechanical engineeringChromatographyElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Six different heats were chosen from an archival data base of X52 pipeline steel using a statistical test design to evaluate the microstructure/microchemistry effects of S, P, and C. Additionally, three heats (X65, X70, X80) of a modern steel were added to the test matrix. Crack growth rates were carried out using compact tension specimens in the carbonate/bicarbonate environment at 75°C and under potential control to evaluate the stage II crack growth rates and the Klscc. In general, the microstructure/microchemistry had a small effect on the SCC behavior. However, the three modern steels had a significantly lower Klscc compared to the X52 steels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207