MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806533309 · doi:10.1190/geo2017-0516.1

Multichannel band-controlled deconvolution based on a data-driven structural regularization

2018· article· en· W2806533309 on OpenAlexaff
Guofa Li, Mo Zhang, Hao Li, Wuyang Yang, Wanli Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
FundersChina National Petroleum CorporationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDeconvolutionSeismic traceInversion (geology)AlgorithmInverse problemRegularization (linguistics)Computer scienceSynthetic dataReflection (computer programming)WaveletMathematicsGeologyArtificial intelligenceSeismologyMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Sparse deconvolution methods frequently invert for subsurface reflection impulses and adopt a trace-by-trace processing pattern. However, following this approach causes unreliability of the estimated reflectivity due to the nonuniqueness of the inverse problem, the poor spatial continuity of structures in the reconstructed reflectivity section, and the suppression on the reflection signals with small amplitudes. We have developed a structurally constrained multichannel band-controlled deconvolution (SC-MBCD) algorithm to alleviate these three issues. The algorithm inverts for a high-resolution seismogram rather than the full-band reflectivity series, thereby reducing the multiple solutions in the inversion and enhancing the reliability of processing results. We also exploited a structural constraint term to guarantee the spatial continuity of the structures, and we enhanced the relatively weak signals. The reflection structure characteristics, defined and extracted from the observed stacked seismic data, are the core of the structural regularization item. We solved the cost function of the SC-MBCD by the alternating direction method of multipliers algorithm. Synthetic model and field data examples demonstrate the rationality of SC-MBCD and confirmed that the algorithm can provide a better inversion result than the conventional sparse spike inversion in terms of retrieving weak reflection events and guaranteeing stratal continuities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207