Electrical conduction mechanism in films of Se<sub>80−<i>x</i></sub>Te<sub>20</sub>Bi<sub><i>x</i></sub> (0 ≤ <i>x</i> ≤ 12) glassy alloys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reports the study of DC electrical conductivity of films of Se80−xTe20Bix (0 ≤ x ≤ 12) glasses prepared using physical vapor deposition method. The films were structurally characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). TEM results indicate the formation of nanorods within the films. The electrical conductivity of the samples was studied using Keithley electrometer in the temperature range 303–373 K. The results show that conduction in these samples takes place via thermally assisted tunnelling and variable range hopping of charge carriers corresponding to higher and lower temperature ranges, respectively. Further, it was found that the conductivity increases with increase in Bi concentration in Se–Te system. This has been explained on the basis of chemically ordered network model. It was also found that nanorod formation improves the electrical conductivity of Se–Te–Bi system compared to bulk Se–Te–Bi system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".