The Size and Emergence of Geochemical Heterogeneities in the Hawaiian Mantle Plume Constrained by Sr‐Nd‐Hf Isotopic Variation Over ∼47 Million Years
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Hawaiian‐Emperor chain is the ∼6,000 km long surface expression of the deeply sourced Hawaiian mantle plume active over the past ∼81 Myr. The Hawaiian Islands (<∼6.5 Ma) present two geographically and geochemically distinct trends, Kea and Loa, while the Emperor Seamounts (>81–47 Ma) show only Kea compositions. New Sr‐Nd‐Hf isotope, trace and major element data of 23 Northwest Hawaiian Ridge (∼47–6.5 Ma) shield‐stage tholeiitic basalts analyzed in this study fill a critical gap and show both Kea and Loa compositions. A logistic regression model fit to a high‐quality isotopic database of Hawaiian Island basalts is used to predict Loa‐type or Kea‐type affinity of new NWHR isotope analyses. Daikakuji, Mokumanamana, West Nīhoa, Nīhoa, and Middle Bank erupt Loa‐type compositions, a finding corroborated by their geochemical characteristics (e.g., low Th/La, CaO/Al2O3, and high Sr/Nb, Zr/Nb, SiO2). Participation of the Loa composition gradually increases toward the Hawaiian Islands with time and there is no evidence for the presence of the Lō‘ihi component along the NWHR or before ∼1 Myr. A new Hf‐Nd Hawaiian array is calculated based on an up‐to‐date extended Hawaiian Island basalt database (n = 403). The NWHR array is slightly steeper than the Hawaiian array, suggesting minimal participation of the high Hf isotopic source component present in Hawaiian Island volcanoes before ∼6.5 Ma. This study fills a significant geochemical data gap in the Hawaiian‐Emperor seamount chain, and shows that Hawaiian plume chemistry evolves significantly with time as the plume samples different deep mantle reservoirs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".