MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806594972 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2018.2843347

Performance Analysis and Code Optimization of IDMA With 5G New Radio LDPC Code

2018· article· en· W2806594972 on OpenAlexaff
Yushu Zhang, Kewu Peng, Xianbin Wang, Jian Song

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLow-density parity-check codeComputer scienceSpectral efficiencyCode rateCode (set theory)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionAlgorithmProgram optimizationBase stationTheoretical computer scienceDecoding methodsComputer networkTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, we focus on the performance analysis and code optimization of interleave-division multiple access (IDMA) with the rate-compatible low-density parity-check (LDPC) code adopted in 5G new radio (5G-NR) technical specification. By combining the multi-edge type density evolution (DE) and extrinsic information transfer (EXIT) analysis, a multi-edge-type DE-aided EXIT analysis is developed to analyze the asymptotic performance of 5G-NR LDPC-coded IDMA, which is shown to be fairly robust against the variations of user number. Then, the base matrix of 5G-NR LDPC code is optimized for IDMA to achieve higher sum spectral efficiency while maintaining the rate compatibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207