MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806594972 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2018.2843347

Performance Analysis and Code Optimization of IDMA With 5G New Radio LDPC Code

2018· article· en· W2806594972 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLow-density parity-check codeComputer scienceSpectral efficiencyCode rateCode (set theory)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionAlgorithmProgram optimizationBase stationTheoretical computer scienceDecoding methodsComputer networkTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, we focus on the performance analysis and code optimization of interleave-division multiple access (IDMA) with the rate-compatible low-density parity-check (LDPC) code adopted in 5G new radio (5G-NR) technical specification. By combining the multi-edge type density evolution (DE) and extrinsic information transfer (EXIT) analysis, a multi-edge-type DE-aided EXIT analysis is developed to analyze the asymptotic performance of 5G-NR LDPC-coded IDMA, which is shown to be fairly robust against the variations of user number. Then, the base matrix of 5G-NR LDPC code is optimized for IDMA to achieve higher sum spectral efficiency while maintaining the rate compatibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it