MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806597708 · doi:10.1109/iccphot.2018.8368472

Rolling shutter imaging on the electric grid

2018· article· en· W2806597708 on OpenAlex
Mark Sheinin, Yoav Y. Schechner, Kiriakos N. Kutulakos

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShutterFlickerComputer scienceRolling shutterRendering (computer graphics)Computer visionPixelArtificial intelligenceGridImage sensorComputer graphics (images)Real-time computingOpticsPhysicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flicker of AC-powered lights is useful for probing the electric grid and unmixing reflected contributions of different sources. Flicker has been sensed in great detail with a specially-designed camera tethered to an AC outlet. We argue that even an untethered smartphone can achieve the same task. We exploit the inter-row exposure delay of the ubiquitous rolling-shutter sensor. When pixel exposure time is kept short, this delay creates a spatiotemporal wave pattern that encodes (1) the precise capture time relative to the AC, (2) the response function of individual bulbs, and (3) the AC phase that powers them. To sense point sources, we induce the spatiotemporal wave pattern by placing a star filter or a paper diffuser in front of the camera's lens. We demonstrate several new capabilities, including: high-rate acquisition of bulb response functions from one smartphone photo; recognition of bulb type and phase from one or two images; and rendering of live flicker video, as if it came from a high speed global-shutter camera.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it