MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806606103

Las negociaciones del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte “TLCAN” y sus perspectivas

2018· article· es· W2806606103 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marcela Guerra Castillo

Bibliographic record

VenuePluralidad y Consenso · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Relations in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesFree trade agreementBusinessPhilosophyFree tradeInternational trade
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EL PREAMBULO DEL TEXTO DEL TRATADO DE Libre Comercio de America del Norte contiene las intenciones que llevaron a Canada, Estados Unidos y Mexico, a firmar ese instrumento: crear un mercado mas extenso y seguro para los bienes y los servicios producidos en sus territorios; establecer reglas claras y de beneficio mutuo para el intercambio comercial; fortalecer la competitividad de sus empresas en los mercados mundiales; alentar la innovacion y la creatividad; y fomentar el comercio de bienes y servicios que esten protegidos por derechos de propiedad intelectual.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePluralidad y ConsensoSame topicInternational Relations in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207