MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806692960

Marine performance evaluation of a fast rescue craft

2018· dissertation· en· W2806692960 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnvironmental Engineering and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNautical mileMarine engineeringPropulsionCoast guardFuel efficiencyTowingEnvironmental scienceEngineeringWind speedWatercraftMeteorologyAutomotive engineeringAerospace engineeringGeographyGeologyOceanography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marine performance evaluation was carried out aboard a fast rescue craft utilized by the Canadian Coast Guard. The experiments were conducted in late 2016 in the waters off Conception Bay South, NL and St. John’s, NL. The three primary focus areas of the study were vessel performance, fuel economy, and human kinetics. The evaluated vessel has a unique propulsion arrangement and is the first to be outfitted in Canada with Mercury Marine DSI 3.0 spark-ignited diesel outboard motors. Motivations to use this type of engine are to unify the Coast Guard’s fuel supply and to also allow engine re-start after inversion. The Canadian Coast Guard is interested in this vessel’s performance in comparison to the rest of the fleet because of these intrinsic advantages. The performance tests concluded that the vessel is very reactive to helm input. It also has much greater directional stability as its speed increases. It can reach its maximum speed in 250 metres, taking approximately 20 seconds to do so. At a full speed of 38 knots, the vessel can execute a 180ᴼ turn in just over 200 metres, and just under 20 metres at manoeuvring speed. The vessel can also tow a 19.7 metre fishing vessel at speeds up to 4.5 knots. The trials showed that the fuel economy was not overly sensitive to wind speed, wind direction, or even wave height. The fuel consumption curve fits a resistance curve that is typical of a planing craft. Its maximum range of 56 nautical miles is achieved at its optimal cruising speed of 24.6 knots. The vessel motions show that the accelerations in the Z direction are the most prominent. The accelerations in the X direction are the lowest, with accelerations in the Y directions being slightly higher. The maximum observed Z acceleration was 4.76 times gravity. The helmsman’s ability to maintain heading is increased with speed due to the higher directional stability observed at higher speeds. Wave height also has a prominent effect on the helmsman’s ability to maintain heading.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.441
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it