Till geochemical signatures of volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits in glaciated terrain: a summary of Canadian examples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits are a significant source of Cu, Pb, Zn, and Ag in Canada. In the glaciated landscape of Canada, till geochemistry is an important exploration method for VMS deposits. This open file report provides an overview of the >50 year history of the application of till geochemical methods to VMS exploration in Canada, and also summarizes appropriate size fractions of till to analyze, analytical techniques, and pathfinder elements. Geochemical methods are now well developed and widely used, most commonly employing the <0.063 mm till fraction and an extensive suite of VMS pathfinder elements, including Cu, Pb and Zn, Ag, Au, Tl, Sn, Se, Hg, In, Cd, Bi, As, Sb, and Ge. In order to detect the clastic glacial dispersal signal down-ice of a VMS deposit, collection and analysis of unoxidized to weakly oxidized till is optimal, whereas B-horizon soil is not. Case studies and examples of glacial dispersal patterns associated with VMS deposits from major mining camps and deposits across Canada are highlighted, including Buchans, Bathurst, Timmins, Noranda, Manitouwadge, Flin Flon, Finlayson Lake, Hackett River, and Izok Lake.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".