PENGEMBANGAN KAWASAN PARIWISATA DANAU TOBA, KABUPATEN TOBA SAMOSIR
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The tourism area of Toba Lake is one of The National Tourism Strategic Areas (KSPN). In the last five years the number of visitors is still low. The aim of this study is to identify the problematic aspects in developing tourism area and the efforts to overcome it. This research is quantitative and used design survey. The aspects in developing the tourism area analyzed were: tourist attraction, accessibility, infrastructure and facilities, as well as social condition and community support. All those aspects was elaborated into indicators which set to be the statements in questionnaire using Likert scale. Based on chi square test, all the aspects has different category significantly. The results showed that accessibility and community support were the aspects with the lower category than others. But, the accessibility need to be prioritised in developing the Toba Lake tourism area in Toba Samosir regency. It is required efforts to provide and improve its accessibility in developing this Toba Lake tourism area in Toba Samosir regency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it