MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806706627 · doi:10.1029/2018jg004408

Yields and Characterization of Dissolved Organic Matter From Different Aged Soils in Northern Alaska

2018· article· en· W2806706627 on OpenAlexaff
Lei Gao, Zhengzhen Zhou, Alberto V. Reyes, Laodong Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilDivision of Ocean SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDissolved organic carbonEnvironmental chemistryChemistrySoil waterOrganic matterTotal organic carbonSoil organic matterPhosphorusNitrogenHumusEnvironmental scienceSoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Soil organic matter (SOM) in northern high‐latitude regions is a major component of the global carbon cycle. However, the yield of soil‐dissolved organic matter (DOM) during soil‐water interactions and its chemical characteristics and reactivities remain poorly understood. We report here elemental composition and isotopic signatures of bulk‐SOM from northern Alaska, and yields of water‐leachable soil‐DOM, including dissolved organic carbon, dissolved organic nitrogen, and dissolved organic phosphorus, and nutrients (dissolved inorganic nitrogen and phosphate). The bulk‐SOM contained 5,400–373,900 μg‐C/g‐soil, 500–12,610 μg‐N/g‐soil, and 38.6–384 μg‐P/g‐soil, with a C/N ratio of 13–37 and a C/P ratio of 80–3,911. The water‐extractable dissolved organic carbon, dissolved organic nitrogen, and dissolved organic phosphorus only accounted for 0.58–2.5%, 0.91–3.4%, and 1.2–3.0% of their corresponding total soil‐OC, N, and OP, respectively. While SOM‐δ 13 C was less variable (−27.08‰ to −26.49‰) showing the same overall C source, 14 C‐ages varied widely from 1,170 ± 20 to 16,200 ± 55 years before present, indicating different deposition‐conditions and subsequent‐processes among the soil samples. The specific‐UV‐absorbance at 254 nm (or aromaticity) of soil‐DOM differed considerably and was negatively correlated to spectral slope values. A humic‐like (C1), a low‐molecular‐weight fulvic‐like (C2), and a protein‐like component (C3) were identified as the major fluorescent‐DOM components. The C3/C2 and C3/C1 ratios generally increased with SOM‐ 14 C‐age, suggesting a preferential degradation/transformation of humic‐like and fulvic‐like components or a transformation/production of protein‐like components within permafrost. Both biological and humification indices increased with 14 C‐age, excluding the oldest soil, which pointed to a preferential preservation or transformation/production of protein‐like DOM within permafrost, implying that soil‐DOM derived from old permafrost can be highly vulnerable and readily decomposed upon permafrost thaw.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research BiogeosciencesSame topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207