MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806722800 · doi:10.18332/tpc/90463

Firsts results and effectiveness National Smoking cessation service in Ukraine

2018· article· en· W2806722800 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Otto Stoyka, Kateryna Rymarenko

Bibliographic record

VenueTobacco Prevention & Cessation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersThird Health ProgrammePlan Nacional sobre DrogasVlaamse regeringHacettepe ÜniversitesiSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungPublic Health AgencyPfizerSociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y ComunitariaMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadGeneralitat de CatalunyaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Science FoundationBloomberg PhilanthropiesEuropean Regional Development FundEuropean CommissionInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of WaterlooBehrakis Foundation
KeywordsSmoking cessationService (business)Environmental healthMedicineBusinessMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Co-funded by the Health Programme of the European Union Aim & ScopeTobacco Prevention & Cessation, (Abbr: Tob.Prev.Cessation; ISSN:2459-3087) is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of tobacco use, prevention and cessation that can promote a tobacco free society.The aim of the journal is to foster, promote and disseminate research involving tobacco use, prevention, policy implementation at a regional, national or international level, disease development -progression related to tobacco use, tobacco use impact from the cellular to the international level and finally the treatment of tobacco attributable disease through smoking cessation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTobacco Prevention & CessationSame topicHealthcare Systems and Public HealthFrench-language works237,207