MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806753048 · doi:10.1590/1981-5794-1804-9

A AQUISIÇÃO DAS VOGAIS PRETÔNICAS EM PORTUGUÊS BRASILEIRO

2018· article· pt· W2806753048 on OpenAlexfundno aff
BOHN Graziela Pigatto, SANTOS Raquel Santana

Bibliographic record

VenueAlfa · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicPhonetics and Phonology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoUniversity of TorontoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsMedicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUMO O artigo discute a aquisição de vogais pretônicas em português brasileiro, por 3 crianças monolíngues adquirindo o dialeto paulista, com idade entre 1;4 e 3;5, e sua relação com a aquisição das vogais no ambiente tônico. Com base em Miranda (2013), partimos do pressuposto de que a aquisição das vogais pretônicas está sujeita à instabilidade desse subsistema, e, portanto, segmentos afetados por processos fonológicos seriam adquiridos mais tardiamente nessa posição. As produções mostram que as vogais altas pretônicas são adquiridas em contraste com as vogais médias, (/i,o/ e /e,u/), sendo a pretônica /o/ adquirida antes de /e/. Analisamos nossos resultados à luz da Hierarquia Contrastiva de Traços (DRESHER, 2009), para a qual a representação lexical dos segmentos é específica de cada língua, trazendo somente os traços contrastivos e ativos em processos fonológicos naquele sistema, e propomos que a aquisição da pauta pretônica é regida por um Princípio de Contraste Máximo: devido a instabilidade dessa posição, os segmentos devem ser maximamente contrastivos, ou seja, por ponto e altura vocálica. A pretônica /e/, por ser a mais instável (cf. CALLOU; MORAES; LEITE, 2002, VIEGAS, 2001 e YACOVENCO, 1993), é a última a ser adquirida, trazendo consigo a pretônica /u/.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlfaSame topicPhonetics and Phonology ResearchFrench-language works237,207