ICT SISTEMI ZA PRAĆENJE I ZAŠTITU DIVLJIH ŽIVOTINJA U NJIHOVOM PRIRODNOM OKRUŽENJU
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rad se bavi sistemima za praćenje i zaštitu divljih životinja u njihovimprirodnim okruženjima, te primenom navedenih tehnologija i rešenja u zaštićenimrezervatima prirode. Rad razmatra razloge i mogućnosti primene navedenihtehničkih rešenja, posebno u smislu zaštite vrsta sa crvene liste ugroženih vrsta. Uovom smislu rad razmatra i tehnološka rešenja te mogućnosti njihove primene krozIoT radni okvir, koncept Interneta životinja, te primene navedenih tehnologija krozrazličite poslovne i istraživačke modele. Konačno, rad daje primere rešenja kako sastanovišta neophodne infrastrukture (serveri, skladište, internet, ogrlice za životinje,stacionarne kamere i dronovi), tako i sa stanovišta obrade podataka i pravnog okviraza primenu navedenih rešenja.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".