MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2806821571

Satellite tracking and stable isotope analysis link wintering and feeding grounds of North Atlantic baleen whales

2017· article· en· W2806821571 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Monica Almeida e Silva, Rui Prieto, Pauline Gauffier, Per J. Palsbøll, Martine Bérubé, Ana Colaço

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhaleBalaenopteraBaleenForagingTrophic levelPredationRange (aeronautics)BiologyCetaceaPelagic zoneOceanographyApex predatorδ13CFisheryEcologyGeographyStable isotope ratioGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knowledge of the distribution of baleen whales throughout their annual cycle is critical for understanding their ecology, life history and behavior, and for their effective conservation. We combined analysis of stable isotopes (δ15N and δ13C) and satellite tracking data of blue (Balaenoptera musculus), fin (B. physalus) and sei whales (B. borealis) encountered in the Azores to determine their wintering ranges, foraging behaviour, and movements towards feeding grounds. Blue, fin and sei whales occupied distinct isotopic spaces and distance between species was mainly driven by differences in δ 13C, suggesting use of different wintering habitats. Fin whales had the lowest δ13C values, consistent with prey sources from offshore areas, whereas the δ13C-enriched signal of sei whales indicate foraging in coastal NW African waters. Blue whales’ δ13C values were intermediate between those of fin and sei whales. Fin whales showed the broadest range and highest δ15N values, suggesting a more diverse prey base with a greater contribution of higher-trophic level organisms. Sex had no effect on isotopic signal in any of the species, indicating similar trophic levels and dietary sources for males and females. Satellite-derived movements of blue (n=10) and fin whales (n=16) indicated foraging at middle latitudes and a mid-Atlantic corridor between the Azores and Iceland-Greenland. Tracks of 8 sei whales provided no evidence of foraging until whales reached the Labrador Sea. One sei whale tagged in September moved towards Canary Islands, where the tag stopped transmitting. Our work suggests a wintering range in temperate-tropical pelagic waters for fin and blue whales migrating through the Azores to Iceland-Greenland. It also shows that part of the sei whale population feeding in the Labrador Sea winter, and possibly breed, in the eastern Atlantic. We discuss these findings in light of current knowledge on the migration strategy and population structure of each whale species

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)→Same topicMarine animal studies overview→French-language works237,207→