MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806884933 · doi:10.1002/anie.201805203

Directed Remote Lateral Metalation: Highly Substituted 2‐Naphthols and BINOLs by In Situ Generation of a Directing Group

2018· article· en· W2806884933 on OpenAlexafffund
Jignesh J. Patel, Marju Laars, Wei Zhong Gan, Matthew O. Kitching, Victor Snieckus

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie International Edition · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCoordination Chemistry and Organometallics
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTallinna Tehnikaülikool
KeywordsMetalationChemistryIn situRing (chemistry)ArylFunctional groupLithium (medication)Group (periodic table)Combinatorial chemistryTransmetalationSequence (biology)StereochemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A general synthesis of highly substituted 2‐naphthols based on a new carbanionic reaction sequence is demonstrated. The reaction exploits the dual nature of lithium bases consisting of consecutive ring opening of readily available coumarins with either LiNEt2 or LiNiPr2 into Z‐cinnamamides, thus generating a directing group in situ and allowing, by conformational freedom, a lateral directed remote metalation for ring closure to give the aryl 2‐naphthols in good to excellent yields. These transformations can be combined to provide a more efficient one‐pot process. Mechanistic insight into the remote lateral metalation step, demonstrating the requirement of Z‐cinnamamide, is described. Application of this methodology to the synthesis of highly substituted 3,3′‐diaryl BINOL ligands is also reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte Chemie International EditionSame topicCoordination Chemistry and OrganometallicsFrench-language works237,207