MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806904895 · doi:10.2134/agronj2017.12.0684

Advanced Agronomic Practices to Maximize Feed Barley Yield, Quality, and Standability in Alberta, Canada. II. Responses to Supplemental Post‐Emergence Nitrogen

2018· article· en· W2806904895 on OpenAlexafffundabout
L. A. Perrott, Sheri Strydhorst, Linda M. Hall, Rong‐Cai Yang, D. Pauly, K. S. Gill, R. Bowness

Bibliographic record

VenueAgronomy Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCrop Yield and Soil Fertility
Canadian institutionsSheridan CollegeUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Ministry of Agriculture and ForestryAgriculture Food and Rural DevelopmentLakeland College
FundersUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Agriculture and ForestryWestern Grains Research FoundationAlberta Crop Industry Development Fund
KeywordsAgronomyYield (engineering)Grain qualityHordeum vulgareUreaNitrogenGrowing seasonNitrateAmmoniumAmmonium nitrateAnimal scienceGrain yieldChemistryBiologyPoaceaeMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Agronomic solutions such as supplemental post‐emergence N may increase yield of feed‐barley grain. Grain yield, grain N yield, and grain protein generally increased as post‐emergence N rate increased. Largest grain yield increases occurred in environments with >300 mm of growing season precipitation. Yields decreased when N was applied as urea ammonium nitrate in hot and low‐precipitation conditions. There were no adverse negative effects to maturity, lodging, or grain quality in ‘Amisk’ feed barley. Small yield gains and decreasing feed barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) acreage in Alberta may be addressed with agronomic solutions. Field experiments were conducted from 2014 to 2016 at 3 irrigated and 11 rain‐fed environments in Alberta, Canada, to determine the effects of supplemental post‐emergence N on ‘Amisk’ feed barley growth, grain yield, and grain quality. At the time of seeding, urea N was applied at rates suitable for targeting average yield potential in each environment. Just prior to BBCH 30 (beginning of stem elongation), this was supplemented with additional 0, 34, and 68 kg N ha −1 in the form of undiluted urea ammonium nitrate (UAN), and 34 kg N ha −1 with the urease inhibitor N‐(n‐butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT). In most environments, grain yield, grain N yield (grain yield × percentage grain N), and grain protein increased with post‐emergence N rate. The largest positive grain yield responses (up to 19%) usually occurred in environments with more than 300 mm of growing season precipitation. Grain yield and grain N yield were significantly reduced when post‐emergence N was applied in high temperatures with low precipitation. Post‐emergence N increased height, but did not markedly change lodging or days to maturity. The grain quality parameters of test weight, starch, and fiber had minor responses to post‐emergence N application. The addition of NBPT to post‐emergence N had little effect on any response variables. Supplemental post‐emergence N provided an agronomic solution for increasing feed barley grain yield, but consistent increases were limited to irrigated or high precipitation environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgronomy JournalSame topicCrop Yield and Soil FertilityFrench-language works237,207