Les musées de l’école et de l’éducation : un champ muséal quantitativement significatif mais difficile à cerner
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En étudiant la gestion, les politiques d’acquisition, de documentation et de valorisation d’un bon nombre d’institutions muséales européennes vouées à l’école et à l’éducation, Myriam Boyer établit une réflexion sur la pérennisation de leurs collections et sur les enjeux liés à leur diffusion. Fondé sur une étude de terrain rigoureuse menée entre 2005 et 2007, le panorama quantitatif et qualitatif qu’elle a dressé lui permet de poser une réflexion démontrant qu’une corrélation peut être établie entre les missions de ces musées et l’esprit du temps d’une société. Pour l’auteure, la sauvegarde de ce patrimoine repose sur deux conditions : la reconnaissance du rôle patrimonial et social de ces collections et le ralliement et la diversification des publics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".