MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806922942 · doi:10.1109/plans.2018.8373394

Using a mobile range-camera motion capture system to evaluate the performance of integration of multiple low-cost wearable sensors and gait kinematics for pedestrian navigation in realistic environments

2018· article· en· W2806922942 on OpenAlexaff
Chandra Tjhai, Jeremy Steward, Derek D. Lichti, Kyle O’Keefe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceKinematicsPedestrianWearable computerMotion captureGaitRange (aeronautics)Computer visionMotion (physics)Gait analysisSimulationArtificial intelligencePhysical medicine and rehabilitationEngineeringEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a comparison of joint angle and step length estimation computed from multiple low-cost wearable sensors and optical systems. Seven wearable sensors are mounted on the pelvis, and the thigh, shank, and foot of both legs. Two types of experiments are conducted, a treadmill walk and straight line walk. The joint angles are estimated using a Kalman filtering method to fuse all sensor measurements. The step lengths are computed based on the estimated joint angles. The results show that the average errors of pitch angles and step lengths are 3 degrees and 6 cm, respectively, for treadmill walk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207