Bibliographic record
Abstract
HISTORY: 17-year-old male athlete presenting with insidious onset of isolated, painless, unilateral quadriceps weakness and wasting. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: Significant unilateral quadriceps atrophy with relative rectus femoris sparing. Strength was mildly reduced on the affected side, but much less than would be expected given his level of atrophy. There were no other sensory or focal neurologic deficits on examination. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS: Monomelic Amyotrophy, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Cord compression, Nerve root/plexopathy TESTS AND RESULTS: Nerve conduction studies, EMG, and MRI findings consistent with final diagnosis FINAL WORKING DIAGNOSIS: Monomelic Amyotrophy (quite rare) TREATMENT AND OUTCOMES: Observation and long-term follow up, conservative management with physiotherapy. Typically clinical deficit remains stable and isolated, but follow-up is required to ensure it is not a different diagnosis. In this clinical case presentation, we review the natural history, epidemiology, diagnosis, differential considerations, prognosis and management of this rare entity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".