Desuper tegens universa musivum. Le décor des coupoles du complexe de Saint-Laurent à Milan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article dresse l’état des connaissances sur le décor des voûtes de la basilique Saint-Laurent à Milan et s’interroge sur la datation, la provenance des matériaux et la signification du décor. L’analyse archéologique et archéométrique des tesselles et des fragments de mosaïques corrobore l’existence des voûtes décorées dans le tétraconque, ainsi que dans les chapelles octogonales, pendant la phase paléochrétienne et la restauration ottonienne. L’apport oriental au chantier des mosaïques est d’autre part prouvé par la provenance levantine d’une partie des tesselles. Enfin, les sources qui décrivent le décor, comme les sujets représentés dans la chapelle de Saint-Aquilin, confirment la volonté de conférer une dimension ultra-terrestre aux voûtes, à travers les sujets iconographiques, mais aussi grâce aux matériaux et à la gestion de la lumière.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".